HPE Equality and Equity, Barriers and Enablers Practice Exam 2025 - Free Equality and Equity Practice Questions and Study Guide.

Disable ads (and more) with a premium pass for a one time $4.99 payment

Question: 1 / 130

Which of the following is a positive effect of government funding?

Reduced interest in local sports

Increased participation in high-profile, elite-level sports

The choice identifying increased participation in high-profile, elite-level sports as a positive effect of government funding highlights the intention behind such funding initiatives. Government funding often aims to enhance the resources available for sports development, which can lead to better training facilities, coaching, and support for athletes. This funding usually focuses on promoting sports that have the potential to raise national pride and achieve international success, which in turn encourages greater participation at the elite level.

When resources are allocated effectively, they can inspire a new generation of athletes to take part in competitive sports, improve the quality of athletic programs, and foster an environment where elite-level sports thrive.

In contrast, decreased interest in local sports, benefits limited only to older athletes, and deterrence of community involvement do not reflect the broader aims and benefits associated with government funding in sports. Such funding generally seeks to enhance community engagement and participation across all age groups, rather than creating a narrow focus or hindering local sports experiences.

Get further explanation with Examzify DeepDiveBeta

It exclusively benefits older athletes

It can deter community involvement in sports

Next

Report this question

Subscribe

Get the latest from Examzify

You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our privacy policy